The European Parliament approves the “veggie burger ban”

What happened, who are the Italian MEPs who voted in favour of this measure, and what will happen next

Paola Sobbrio
Paola Sobbrio 09/10/2025 · 5 min read
Il Parlamento Europeo approva il "veggie burger ban"

The European Parliament has approved an amendment banning the use of words such as “burger”, “hamburger”, “sausage”, “steak”, “escalope” or “carpaccio” for products that contain no meat.

In practice, plant-based food producers will no longer be able to use names that evoke the world of meat, even when accompanied by terms such as “veg”, “veggie” or “soy”.

The vote was far from unanimous: 355 MEPs in favour, 247 against and 30 abstentions.

It was one of the most debated decisions of recent months in the field of European food policy.

The amendment, inserted into the Common Agricultural Policy reform package, stems from the idea that words traditionally associated with meat should remain reserved for products of animal origin.
According to its promoters, the aim is to “ensure clarity for consumers” and protect agricultural and livestock producers from what is perceived as unfair competition.

Supporters of the measure argue that using words like “burger” or “sausage” for plant-based foods can cause confusion, leading buyers to believe they are purchasing a product with nutritional characteristics similar to meat.
For them, a “lentil burger” is not simply a healthier or more sustainable variant, but an improper use of an identity term, one that is part of a deeply rooted food tradition.

Criticism and the political divide

The measure, however, has deeply divided the European Parliament and public opinion.

Many MEPs and environmental organisations have criticised the ban, calling it an ideological rather than a practical battle — a way to symbolically defend meat rather than truly inform consumers.

According to those opposed, citizens know perfectly well what they are buying when they read “vegetable burger” or “tofu sausage”: no one thinks it is meat.
The language of food, they argue, has evolved alongside eating habits. Banning terms that are now in common use would mean hindering innovation and penalising a growing sector.

Furthermore, many companies will have to face rebranding and repackaging costs to comply with the new rules, with economic effects that cannot be overlooked.

Italian positions

The Italian delegation in Strasbourg also showed itself to be divided.

  • In favour of the ban, the MEPs of Fratelli d’Italia, Lega and Forza Italia voted as a bloc, speaking of “defending the Made in Italy agri-food sector and livestock farmers”.
  • Against, on the other hand, were many representatives of the Partito Democratico, Alleanza Verdi e Sinistra and the Movimento 5 Stelle, who accused the majority of “weaponising words” to block the ecological transition in the food sector.

In other words: a divide that mirrors national ideological lines, tradition versus innovation, protectionism versus free market.

What happens now

The regulation approved by Parliament is not yet definitive law.
It will need to be discussed with the member states and approved by the Council of the European Union before it can enter into force.
If confirmed, it will require plant-based food producers to change their labels, packaging and advertising materials.
No more “veggie burger”, but perhaps “chickpea patty”, “vegetable disc” or “soy-based preparation”.

A language that many consider more artificial and less comprehensible to the public.

On one side is the desire to protect traditions; on the other, the need to make room for new, more sustainable models of consumption and production.

The battle over the “veggie burger” is not merely a linguistic dispute: it is a reflection of the tension between past and future, between local food culture and global innovation.
Ultimately, the way we name food reveals how we want to think about our relationship with nature, the future and sustainability.

How did Italian MEPs vote?

We have collected the positions of individual Italian MEPs.

Next week we will be in Brussels to meet them and lay the groundwork for the next vote, with the aim of overturning this decision that is harmful to the sector and to consumers.

How did they vote?

GroupSurnameVote
ECRBerlatoIn favour
ECRCavedagnaIn favour
ECRCiccioliIn favour
ECRCirianiIn favour
ECRDonazzanIn favour
ECRFidanzaIn favour
ECRFiocchiIn favour
ECRGambinoIn favour
ECRGemmaIn favour
ECRInselviniIn favour
ECRMagoniIn favour
ECRMantovaniIn favour
ECRMilazzoIn favour
ECRNesciIn favour
ECRPicaroIn favour
ECRPolatoIn favour
ECRProcacciniIn favour
ECRRazzaIn favour
ECRSbernaIn favour
ECRSquartaIn favour
ECRVentolaIn favour
ECRVivaldiniIn favour
ECRTorselliIn favour
PPEChinniciIn favour
PPEDe MeoIn favour
PPEFalconeIn favour
PPEMorattiIn favour
PPEPrinciIn favour
PPESaliniIn favour
PPETosiIn favour
PfESardoneIn favour
PfEStancanelliIn favour
PfETovaglieriIn favour
PfEVannacciIn favour
S&DBenifeiIn favour
S&DBonacciniIn favour
S&DLupoIn favour
S&DMorettiIn favour
S&DNardellaIn favour
S&DPiciernoIn favour
S&DRuotoloIn favour
S&DTarquinioIn favour
S&DTinagliIn favour
S&DZingarettiIn favour
S&DAntociAgainst
S&DCorradoAgainst
The LeftDella ValleAgainst
PPEDorfmannAgainst
The LeftFuroreAgainst
S&DGoriAgainst
Verts/ALEGuardaAgainst
S&DLauretiAgainst
The LeftLucanoAgainst
S&DMaranAgainst
Verts/ALEMarinoAgainst
The LeftMoraceAgainst
Verts/ALEOrlandoAgainst
The LeftPalmisanoAgainst
The LeftPedullàAgainst
Verts/ALEScuderiAgainst
S&DStradaAgainst
The LeftTamburranoAgainst
S&DZanAgainst
/* Semi-transparent backdrop behind the dialog */ dialog::backdrop { background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.45); backdrop-filter: blur(2px); }/* — REFOOD table style — */ dialog table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; margin-top: 1rem; font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.5; }dialog th, dialog td { text-align: left; padding: 12px 16px; border-bottom: 1px solid #e0e0e0; }dialog th { background-color: #000; color: #fff; font-weight: 600; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.05em; }dialog tr:nth-child(even) { background-color: #f9f9f9; }dialog tr:hover { background-color: #f0f0f0; transition: background-color 0.2s ease; }dialog td:first-child, dialog th:first-child { border-top-left-radius: 8px; }dialog td:last-child, dialog th:last-child { border-top-right-radius: 8px; }/* Responsive optimisation */ @media (max-width: 600px) { dialog table { font-size: 14px; } dialog th, dialog td { padding: 10px; } }
Paola Sobbrio
WRITTEN BY Paola Sobbrio

Giurista esperta in normative sul benessere animale.

Since 2005, I have taught law and bioethics at the undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral levels. Since 2010, for scientific research, I have been working on biotechnology in the food sector, with a particular focus on GMOs and cultured meats, both from a regulatory and bioethical perspective. I have published scientific articles in national and international journals and monographs on the relationship between law and ethics in relation to animal welfare policies and regulations. I am a Project Manager for Refood.

✉️ RESTIAMO IN CONTATTO

Iscriviti alla newsletter di REFOOD per ricevere le ultime notizie e gli aggiornamenti sulle nostre campagne.